Actually the Grand Lodge is the only body tha can approve changes to the wording of the obligation and it has to be presented at GL and voted on so it would not be easy to do. Com. on Work can only change the foot work. So if you are a member of GL then you would be responsible for rewritting any aprt of the work.
yes it is on ballot but RUMOR is C.O.W. is not backing it and that is pretty much the nail in the coffin for any resolution, if that is true.
The C.O.W. did not back the resolution that made it legal to own a code book, and it passed. It will be an intresting to see how this and some other resolutions do during the 2009 session.
Well the "Committe on Hop and Change" may just have to get on board.. !
the proposal that will come before Grand Lodge this year is asking us to authorize Grand Lodge officers to violate their EA Obligation. Bad precedent in my huimble opinion.
Question on C.O.W. how does one become a member and how long are they on that committee?
I really do not have a hard core opinion this one, I see many Grand Jurisdiction doing just fine while actually writing out the work in plain english. Ours being a cypher book you have to know how to cypher it so it is almost imposable to learn the work from it if you have never heard it. I certainly respect the way C.O.W. feels and do not feel this one will pass but as said before I did not feel the code book itself would pass in the first place but here we are.
The COW is made up of 5 brothers who make themselves availabe to serve the GLOT for a period of 5 years. They are the only committee in GL that selects their own Chairman. There is also a requirement that they must make themselves familiar with the work.