The practice speaks of arrogance. Forget the ritual differences and for a moments lets assume magically they all because identical. However, each grand lodge kept its current advancement requirements. Here we would still have an issue. Lets say a brother has never learned a Q&A format of Masonic education. Lets say that same brother is a published Masonic author. Do you really think because you know a question with a predetermined answer that this brother doesn't that you are uniquely qualified to take his property? My thoughts for this example would be our late Brother John J. Robinson. Before he was an EA he had already written one of the most popular Masonic books in modern history.
So while he probably couldn't answer a question the day he was raised in the Q&A situation he could school you on Masonic history and his theory. The same goes for Brother Manly P. Hall. The day he became a MM he may not have known ritually why he became a MM. But I would venture the vast majority of Freemasons today couldn't hold a flame to him regarding esoterics at the end of their Masonic life compared to him before he was initiated.
I see no part relating to Friendship, Morality, and Brotherly Love that fits into "give me your stuff. you don't know what I think you should."
So while he probably couldn't answer a question the day he was raised in the Q&A situation he could school you on Masonic history and his theory. The same goes for Brother Manly P. Hall. The day he became a MM he may not have known ritually why he became a MM. But I would venture the vast majority of Freemasons today couldn't hold a flame to him regarding esoterics at the end of their Masonic life compared to him before he was initiated.
I see no part relating to Friendship, Morality, and Brotherly Love that fits into "give me your stuff. you don't know what I think you should."