My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
When I asked the question to about 10 people I got about 11 answers. Each of which you could tell the person really wasn't sure. It reminded me of the time I asked "What is Masonic Communication?" There does not seem to be a universal stance.
I have tackled this before with GL and and all I received was a good ole fashion run around. We actually found conflicting statements in the law book vs other GL Documents. The best you are going to get is an interpritation of what someone "believes it says". I would use the Vanguard Requirments...
Nope. We did do this at meeting one time where an investigator stood up and discussed his findings. A PM then contacted GL and the members was soon contacted by our DDGM, by recommendation of the GM, and he was told what he had done was considered "campaigning", whether it be for or against, and...
I ask myself this when I see some older members as well. I know Past Masters that probably wouldn't have made it in if they weren't someones kin or something. I don't see a problem with 18 if the person is ready. He goes through the same process as any other Mason and I bet the retention rate is...
Keep in mind also just because someone has been found guilty of a crime of "Moral Turpitude" this does not exclude them from being able to receive the degrees of Freemasonry, with the exception of the crime on a child. This is why the Lodge must do a thurough investigation and trust the...
Brother Johnnie, Article 505 is listing items that are considered a Masonic Offense and are there subject to Masonic Charges. Therefore, item 20 which is is listed should never be allowed. That is where the "cannot" comes from. You need to read the whole law as it is stated in the book to see...
Recent Update: Member Melekh ha-Mashiach has been blackballed from MoTX. He made a few posts (not this one) that were questionable in nature. When contacted by staff it became very obvious he had questionable motives for his posts. We hold respect towards other members to be the highest priority...
I will take a Double Double over a Whataburger ANYDAY. I heard they are building one in North Texas and I almost fell out of my chair. I am getting giddy just thinking about it. Something about being in Vegas and riding the CAT(Bus) to In-N-Out scarfing down a burger then back to the casinos. Oh...
Well if I use your equation what makes the government the answer?
(Government< Successful at anything) = (Government=bad at everything)
So if I take this equation and put it with yours.
I believe
BP>Government=Oil Leak Solution
Thats all I am saying. And I likey oil too.
And who could do better? The fact is that we are an oil driven world. We need it to survive and this is a risk involved with drilling. Sure in the perfect world the "fail safes" would have worked but in the perfect world there would not be automobile or airplane crashes. Just because they they...
Really though??
What can the Government do? I hate how the government needs to be in control. Why? BP is the expert. They are the one that knows how to design the wells and how oil reacts. Do people really believe BP does not want this thing capped? I am sure BP is doing everything that is...