I have a general question about learning the work of the various degrees.
Due to certain circumstances, my EA has gone very, very slowly...I'm almost done with the first section, but it remains to go rather slowly.
With my interest in Freemasonry, I've been scouring the net looking for interesting articles and things to read, including a lot of the 'anti-masonry' related material that is available...
Today, I stumbled upon something that presents somewhat of an ethical dilemma...but perhaps it isn't.
I stumbled upon an anti-masonry website that had another state's version of all three degrees, including the work I have sworn not to write/duplicate in any form or fashion.
I didn't realize how accurate (but at the same time, inaccurate) it was until I started reading it...and then stopped.
Herein lies my dilemma...using this published document, I can separate the wheat from the chaff easily, because I understand the work, I simply can't get enough contiguous training time to actually get through it.
It's my feeling that I could use this document, separating the wheat from the chaff, and self study and finish this work rather quickly. Using it as somewhat of a cypher that MMs are allowed to use in some states...as it's *that* complete.
Should I turn my back on this source, and continue with the traditional methods, or use this source...as I'm reading something someone else created.
As an aside, I am reaching out to my lodge's WM for a definitive answer, but I thought the discussion might be of interest... I will post my WM's definitive answer when I receive it.
Ken
Due to certain circumstances, my EA has gone very, very slowly...I'm almost done with the first section, but it remains to go rather slowly.
With my interest in Freemasonry, I've been scouring the net looking for interesting articles and things to read, including a lot of the 'anti-masonry' related material that is available...
Today, I stumbled upon something that presents somewhat of an ethical dilemma...but perhaps it isn't.
I stumbled upon an anti-masonry website that had another state's version of all three degrees, including the work I have sworn not to write/duplicate in any form or fashion.
I didn't realize how accurate (but at the same time, inaccurate) it was until I started reading it...and then stopped.
Herein lies my dilemma...using this published document, I can separate the wheat from the chaff easily, because I understand the work, I simply can't get enough contiguous training time to actually get through it.
It's my feeling that I could use this document, separating the wheat from the chaff, and self study and finish this work rather quickly. Using it as somewhat of a cypher that MMs are allowed to use in some states...as it's *that* complete.
Should I turn my back on this source, and continue with the traditional methods, or use this source...as I'm reading something someone else created.
As an aside, I am reaching out to my lodge's WM for a definitive answer, but I thought the discussion might be of interest... I will post my WM's definitive answer when I receive it.
Ken