My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

[GLoT] Question on officers present when opening lodge

dhouseholder

Registered User
Here is the scenario: A called meeting on the EA degree was to be opened to hear the proficiency of an EA. The officers present were the SW, SD, JD, Marshall, Tiler, and a PM (all members of the lodge), 2 FCs, and 2 EAs, for a grand total of 11 members present. The WM had given permission for the SW to open said called meeting.

The issue: It was thought that the SW was to act as WM, but the SD, JD, Marshall, and Tiler were all required to sit in their places during the opening and closing of said lodge; and that the other brothers present were required to fill in other required places and stations. I have found nothing in the Laws of the GLoT, or the bylaws of the lodge stating this, but it was argued by some of the bretherin that all lodge officers were to occupy their elected and appointed places and not pro-temp for other "indispensable" positions.

The question: Is it required that officers are always, no matter the reason, are to sit in their stations and places when the lodge is duly opened?

The only articles I have found in the Law Book concerning this are the two following...

Art. 229. (267a). Quorum for Each of the Three Degrees.
To open a subordinate Lodge chartered by this Grand Lodge on the
Masters Degree, and a quorum for a Lodge on said degree, requires
the presence of not less than three Master Masons who are
members of such Lodge, and one of said three must be the Worshipful
Master, a Warden or a Past Master of such Lodge; to open on the
Fellowcraft Degree, and a quorum for a Lodge on said degree,
requires the presence of not less than five Masons of at least that
degree, at least two of whom must be Master Masons and members
of such Lodge and one of said two must be the Worshipful Master,
a Warden or a Past Master of such Lodge; to open on the Entered
Apprentice Degree, and a quorum for a Lodge on said degree,
requires the presence of not less than seven Masons, at least one of
whom must be the Worshipful Master, a Warden or a Past Master
of such Lodge.

Art. 235. (273). Called Meetings: Business Permitted.
Called Meetings may be ordered by the Master of the Lodge, or
by the Senior Warden in his absence, or by the Junior Warden in
the absence of both, at any time not prohibited by law for any one
or more of the following purposes: to receive the Grand Master
or his Representative or other distinguished Mason; to confer
degrees on candidates previously elected; to examine and vote on
the proficiency of candidates; to install officers; to conduct funerals,
to receive and vote on adoption of by-laws under Subdivision 4
of Art. 216; to adopt by-laws and amendments thereto when duly
called for that purpose after reasonable notice given; to transact
any other business not required by law to be acted on at a Stated
Meeting. The Secretary may be ordered to issue summons for such
meetings when the circumstances are deemed such as to warrant
it; such summons must be in writing and under the seal of the
Lodge.

Any light would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:

dhouseholder

Registered User
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

Would a moderator be able to correct the spelling error in the title of this thread from "openning" to "opening"? Thanks!
 

Brother JC

Moderating Staff
Staff Member
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

I could only say how it goes in NM, but I'm interested to hear the answer so I can compare it.
 

Bro. Stewart P.M.

Lead Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

The answer to your question is, yes.

All elected and appointed officers must be in their proper positions when opening and closing. The only ones allowed to move are...

Senior Warden to the East when the East is vacant.

Junior Warden to the East when both the West and East are vacant. The Junior Warden can only move to the East under this condition.

In the absence of all three principal officers, the most recent Past Master may assume the East.


All other stations and places to be filled by qualified Brethren. You can find this information under the duties of the "Worshipful Master" relating to vacancy.
 
Last edited:

rpbrown

Premium Member
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

You must sit in the place or station of your office during opening unless as Brother Stewart said above, the Master is not present.

However, with all that you listed above, the seven required for an EA were not present as you have to be a MM to sit in an office.
 

Bro. Stewart P.M.

Lead Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

You must sit in the place or station of your office during opening unless as Brother Stewart said above, the Master is not present.

However, with all that you listed above, the seven required for an EA were not present as you have to be a MM to sit in an office.

To open an EA lodge (GLoTX) seven members must be present, only one has to be a Master Mason. Refer to the EA lecture.

According to the original post, there were 6 MM's present, a total of 11 members.
 

crono782

Premium Member
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

Interesting. So there are potentially several scenarios where you may have a requisite number of masons present, but still unable to properly open a lodge? (ex: SW and JW absent, only others present are already officers and 1 EA there for a proficiency. In such case, a steward or Marshall could not sit for the vacancy?)

Or is it written such that in a similar case, that rule can be overruled?


Freemason Connect HD
 
Last edited:

Bro. Stewart P.M.

Lead Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

Interesting. So there are potentially several scenarios where you may have a requisite number of masons present, but still unable to properly open a lodge? (ex: SW and JW absent, only others present are already officers and 1 EA there for a proficiency. In such case, a steward or Marshall could not sit for the vacancy?)

Or is it written such that in a similar case, that rule can be overruled?


Freemason Connect HD

In the extreme case that there is no WM, SW, JW, or the most recent Past Master; a Past Master (of the same lodge) may assume the East.

But yes, it is conceivable that you can have the prerequisite number but not have sufficiently "qualified" members present to open.
 

dhouseholder

Registered User
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

The answer to your question is, yes.

All elected and appointed officers must be in their proper positions when opening and closing. The only ones allowed to move are...

Senior Warden to the East when the East is vacant.

Junior Warden to the East when both the West and East are vacant. The Junior Warden can only move to the East under this condition.

In the absence of all three principal officers, the most recent Past Master may assume the East.


All other stations and places to be filled by qualified Brethren. You can find this information under the duties of the "Worshipful Master" relating to vacancy.

Thank you brother, but I cannot find this information in the Law Book, I did find...

Art. 268. Temporary Vacancies: How Filled. The presiding
officer alone has the right to fill vacancies pro tempore.

... which implies that pro-tempore positions can be filled at the presiding Master's will. Also, emphasis mine,...

Art. 271. Vacancies in Office: How Filled. When an
installed officer, other than the Worshipful Master, ... is unable to devote his services
to the office, the office can only be filled pro tempore, at each
meeting of the Lodge,
except as hereinafter provided:
... the Master shall have
the right to appoint any officer pro tempore, including Secretary or
Treasurer, any specific meeting upon the absence of such officer
from the particular meeting.
(See Art. 277 for vacancy in office of
Worshipful Master.) (Revised 1967)

Which actually says the opposite of what you have described. Am I reading this right? I was told by more knowledgeable brethren what you have told me as well, but I must have some Missourian in my blood because I'd like to see it in the law and make sure that it wasn't a myth that continues to be propagated by word of mouth.
 

crono782

Premium Member
I've heard both answers given by brothers of my lodge so I'm just as confused. I get the reasoning, but doesn't it seem strange that GL would put a rule into place that puts propriety over being able to hold a meeting?
 

Bro. Stewart P.M.

Lead Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

Thank you brother, but I cannot find this information in the Law Book, I did find...

Art. 268. Temporary Vacancies: How Filled. The presiding
officer alone has the right to fill vacancies pro tempore.

... which implies that pro-tempore positions can be filled at the presiding Master's will. Also, emphasis mine,...

Art. 271. Vacancies in Office: How Filled. When an
installed officer, other than the Worshipful Master, ... is unable to devote his services
to the office, the office can only be filled pro tempore, at each
meeting of the Lodge,
except as hereinafter provided:
... the Master shall have
the right to appoint any officer pro tempore, including Secretary or
Treasurer, any specific meeting upon the absence of such officer
from the particular meeting.
(See Art. 277 for vacancy in office of
Worshipful Master.) (Revised 1967)

Which actually says the opposite of what you have described. Am I reading this right? I was told by more knowledgeable brethren what you have told me as well, but I must have some Missourian in my blood because I'd like to see it in the law and make sure that it wasn't a myth that continues to be propagated by word of mouth.

Remind me of what 277 says?
 

Bro. Stewart P.M.

Lead Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member
I've heard both answers given by brothers of my lodge so I'm just as confused. I get the reasoning, but doesn't it seem strange that GL would put a rule into place that puts propriety over being able to hold a meeting?

When in doubt go to the source yourself, consult the Law Book.
 

Bro. Stewart P.M.

Lead Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member
In part I am teaching you to read the book directly.

Remember you must look at the question from a couple of angles. Dig deeper the answers are in the book. Don't always trust what is "said"....


I have been over this on several times... Have Fun, and learn in the process.
 

dhouseholder

Registered User
Re: [GLoT] Question on officers present when openning lodge

Remind me of what 277 says?

Art. 277. (315). Office Vacant: When and How Filled. His
office becomes vacant whenever the Worshipful Master:
1. Is elected and installed as Grand Master or Deputy Grand
Master; or
2. Dies after he is installed; or
3. Is found disqualified, or fails from any cause to be installed
within the time prescribed by Law, and the person filling the office
for the previous year has been installed in another office; or
4. When the Worshipful Master has been removed by the
Grand Master or the Grand Lodge, the Grand Master shall notify
the Grand Secretary, and shall inform the affected subordinate
Lodge of such action. Such action of removal shall prohibit recognition
of such individual as a Past Master and preclude such
individual from the rights and privileges pertaining thereto.
(Revised 1997)
In any such case the Senior Warden (or the Junior Warden, if
the office of Senior Warden is also vacant) shall succeed to all the
duties of the office.
If a Worshipful Master, after being duly installed, dies during
the term of his office, and if he is not suspended or under charges
at the time of his death, he shall be classified and recorded as a
Past Master of his Lodge.

As far as I read it, this article says nothing on our topic.
 

JTM

"Just in case"
Premium Member
I don't know that this refers to what happens when the WM isn't there "today"
 

Bro. Stewart P.M.

Lead Moderator Emeritus
Staff Member
See the following GLoTX Laws:

Art. 269; Art. 270; Art. 285; Art. 286

This should clear everything up.... Oh and of course Art. 271 first paragraph, already quoted.
 

dhouseholder

Registered User
See the following GLoTX Laws:

Art. 269; Art. 270; Art. 285; Art. 286

This should clear everything up.... Oh and of course Art. 271 first paragraph, already quoted.

So, just to be clear, in my original scenario, it was legal to open a lodge with the officers and members present. Thanks!
 
Top