This was told me by some brethren after some individuals were trying to contest a ballot of a candidate:
“I didn’t know we were a rehabilitation institution…”
A problem with this is it is hypocritical. Unless I am misunderstanding this, which I am sure I am, the men that spoke to you were holding a candidate to standard they were not holding themselves to. These men were violating GL law by discussing a ballot, how they would vote, or why they voted a certain way. Having said that, I don't think anyone here is saying we need to rehabilitate but rather forgive those who have been rehabilitated. It should be an individual case by case basis and if the investigation committee is not doing their job don't blame the petitioners blame they lazy investigators.
I ask because you'd think if the GLOT/Prince Hall situation would receive resolutions to fix it if enough people felt so strongly about it.
This is not like a club wanting recognition this is another Grand Jurisdiction requesting it and it must go through the Fraternal Relations committee and be reported on as other jurisdictions are each year. It is not as easy as a resolution to recognize them due to the formalities. In this case there was a one year layover and should be reported this year with the recommendation of the committee. This is so they can work out any logistics if needed.