jvarnell
Premium Member
*Bold added by me for emphasis
There is no "JUST A THEORY" in science. This is the point we are trying to get across here. The theory about lockness is NOT a scientific theory it is a theory in the usage most people are familiar with, in science it would be a hypothesis at best. Everything in science is just a theory. Nothing it proven 100% in science, not ever, its the nature of the beast. While it is true that some theories have more evidence than others, and some have flaws, evolution is one that is pretty well understood. Sure Darwin didn't have it 100% correct, we all know that, however it was a starting point. If you think there has been more disproved than accepted then then you simply don't understand Darwin's complete theories.
If you look at Darwins theory of how he viewed the formation of Locness you will see it makes since but as more facts came to light everyone found the way he put together the facts he had was right but ithe theory was wrong. The deferances between glacial and pplate tectonics.