My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Freemasonry in Politics

bonesman13

Registered User
When I got into masonry I was told we don't discuss politics here. We find this completely false. Politics has and will always be discussed in the lodge building and it even makes it into the lodge room. It defines our existence as a freemason. Masonic history and politics are inseparably entwined.

Now, there are three types of political discussion I have seen: (1) discussing the outer world where in that case we are acting in a role of community builders and activists and our discussion should be there to foster education and improve the understanding about elected officials and candidates (2) discussion of lodge officer candidates and (3) the destructive, malicious, racist comments of those who are destroyers - not builders (those who will need many years to build a proper foundation) before they should be listened to.

First let me take the latter: we tolerate comments from some of our brethren when in reality we need to check their attitudes and let them know clearly that our organization loves to build and abhors destruction. Too often we allow folks to vent in lodge when should they wish to vent they should do so at home. Its a sensitive issue but one that needs to be addressed.

Second, during an election, we should have bios that discuss their background, qualifications, and goals so we can make an informed decision as we should be doing in all elections. If a lodge has a contested race lets see who could talk better about their opponent than themselves. Its novel but its a bridge builder. I don't want to hear why you are better, I want to hear positive accolades because in the end, we move forward together.

Third, if you do not think our masonic forefathers did not discuss politics then you need to work more on your foundation. 50 of 56 of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were freemasons. Some may tell you the numbers are lower but I propose to you that we include ALL our brethren (EAs and FCs as well as others). Trust me those daring men who "discussed politics" at every place they met put their lives on the line to build this country. Now some folks try to play games by telling you not to discuss politics in lodge or they will draw up masonic charges. I ask are you here to make the world better or are you here to eat dinner with your friends as you slip into obscurity and into a retirement home.

Still don't believe it. Take note: masonic writing is very concise and each word is carefully put into place. Now, compare writings like the Constitution, Dec of Independence, Bill or Rights with current bills and see that masons influenced the shaping of our country more than we know.

Finally: the statue that symbolizes our freedom and liberty was made by French freemasons and symbolizes the light of masonry being spread throughout this country by YOU

This my friend is a call to arms, a wake up call, a message that it is time to once again pick up the tools of your trade and labour in the communities you call home. Our forefathers were known to be masons by their deeds not their bumper stickers or jewelry.
 

dfreybur

Premium Member
I think the usual term is "partisan politics" that's technically banned. We do tend to expand that to resist as much politics as we can but as you point out humans are group beings who discuss all levels of group.

I figure we should be able to discuss principles as long as we stay non-partisan but that's a difficult judgment call requiring much self restraint.

Another example political action that was not partisan - Masonry's involvement in the 19th century for the transition to public schools by for through taxation. Today public school discourse tends to be very partisan but in an era with only private schools it started out as a non-partisan matter of principles.
 

Tony Uzzell

Registered User
I'm not sure why this is in "Anti-Masonic Discussions", but I'll play.

How about a Lodge sponsoring a voter registration drive or a non-partisan debate/"get to know the candidates" question-and-answer session (some local pols are afraid of the word "debate", so you have to get around that). For city council, school board, or county commissioner races (you'd probably have to stay out of any races where a candidate was a Mason, but...), it might very well be the only agency running such an event (in larger cities, the League of Women Voters gets involved, but they often stay out of local races or smaller towns).

Also, be clear to all candidates concerned that you are not offering an endorsement from the Lodge. Individual brethren offering support/donations/etc. are up the individual members, but the Lodge must stay uncommitted to any candidate or Party.

TU
 

Brother_Steve

Premium Member
I don't want to hear, "They must be on the Obama plan, permanent unemployment and we get to pay for them." at dinner or lodge whether I agree with them or not.

However if tyranny is present, it is our job as masons to act.
 

dfreybur

Premium Member
How do you reconcile that statement with the Charges in the EA Degree? It's a question I've had for a while.

Letter of the law versus spirit of the law is the issue to me. Plus the charges are not a part of the oath. Plus it's only the WM during the Installation who assents for the term of his year in the east.

So unless I'm WM that year to me there is an implicit "just" before the word magistrate.

I take the issue the way I was taught in Navy boot camp about lawful orders. There's a point when it becomes clear that orders are unlawful and at that point it becomes our duty to refuse. The first to refuse faces the music in a court martial but soon the entire unit refuses. This happened in Egypt under a year ago when their military refused to fire on civilians.
 
Top