fkebld
Registered User
Brothers,
I've had a thought running around my head as of late and, being this community is full of wise and learned views, I thought I'd ask for your perspective.
Do you think the fraternity would be better served if Lodge photos, Officer photos, and the like were discouraged?
My thinking: the mystery of the Lodge, its officers and even (as trivial as this may be) its furniture, is somewhat lessened by the flash of a camera, with its blast-out lighting, awkward pretense and so on. Would it hurt or help if we kept the lodge "inner sanctum" a secret?
Of course this is not always practical, and this isn't a point of activism. I'd just like to know your thoughts.
I've had a thought running around my head as of late and, being this community is full of wise and learned views, I thought I'd ask for your perspective.
Do you think the fraternity would be better served if Lodge photos, Officer photos, and the like were discouraged?
My thinking: the mystery of the Lodge, its officers and even (as trivial as this may be) its furniture, is somewhat lessened by the flash of a camera, with its blast-out lighting, awkward pretense and so on. Would it hurt or help if we kept the lodge "inner sanctum" a secret?
Of course this is not always practical, and this isn't a point of activism. I'd just like to know your thoughts.