My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

UGLE

coachn

Coach John S. Nagy
Premium Member
...We don't know the real origin of speculative Freemasonry. We can point to Elias Ashmole's admission; we have the 16th C records from Scotland. ...
Well, actually we do. It's privatized morality-based arena theater focused upon conveying allegorical truths using the façade and lexicon of stonecraft lore and such, but we call it "speculative masonry" because it sounds better to us rough and tumble guys.
 

Glen Cook

G A Cook
Site Benefactor
Well, actually we do. It's privatized morality-based arena theater focused upon conveying allegorical truths using the façade and lexicon of stonecraft lore and such, but we call it "speculative masonry" because it sounds better to us rough and tumble guys.
But that's not a "when" answer. We don't know "when" our theatre was adopted.
 

JM-MWPHGLGA

Premium Member
No one warrented those grand lodges. Grand lodges don't have to be chartered or warranted. They may be formed by three or more regular lodges.

We don't know the real origin of speculative Freemasonry. We can point to Elias Ashmole's admission; we have the 16th C records from Scotland.

Recommend you read Freemasons for Dummies (that is not a reflection on you) and take the Master Craftsman Course through AASR-SJ.
I understand the concept that grand lodges doesn't have to be charted or warrant. In order for a grand lodge to became a grand lodge there must first be a lodge. Now due to warrants wasn't necessary back then that's understandable. With warrants being the new age of who's regular or not now is when we have a big problem. Because it's relative new, the conversation of irregular and regular is really not valid. Why? Because the origin of the UGLE didn't carry those type of documents and didn't care for them. And I'm PHA, I'm just interested in how it started on the other side of the fence.


Sent from my iPhone using My Freemasonry Pro
 

Glen Cook

G A Cook
Site Benefactor
I understand the concept that grand lodges doesn't have to be charted or warrant. In order for a grand lodge to became a grand lodge there must first be a lodge. Now due to warrants wasn't necessary back then that's understandable. With warrants being the new age of who's regular or not now is when we have a big problem. Because it's relative new, the conversation of irregular and regular is really not valid. Why? Because the origin of the UGLE didn't carry those type of documents and didn't care for them. And I'm PHA, I'm just interested in how it started on the other side of the fence.


Sent from my iPhone using My Freemasonry Pro
It was the same side of the fence for PHA as well.

Well, your belief that the concept of irregularity is not valid would be at variance with your own GL and a couple hundred other GL's, but it's a free country.
 

JM-MWPHGLGA

Premium Member
It was the same side of the fence for PHA as well.

Well, your belief that the concept of irregularity is not valid would be at variance with your own GL and a couple hundred other GL's, but it's a free country.
Oh yes I know prince hall went through mainstream. I'm fully aware of that. Now that doesn't mean I will break my obligation n discuss masonry with so-called clandestine groups of today. The whole focus point is being able to know more. Ask questions. Be a critical thinker. I mean isn't that one of our seven liberal arts and science. Thinking outside the box. To paint the picture more clearly, if Mason's can become aware of the real true meaning of a mason this topic wouldn't exist.


Sent from my iPhone using My Freemasonry Pro
 

dfreybur

Premium Member
In order for a grand lodge to became a grand lodge there must first be a lodge.

FreeMasonry evolved from the guild system. The guild system evolved from previous historical systems. The chain of history and prehistory goes back to the point there were enough inventions in the field of architecture that a master/apprentice system was needed.

Now due to warrants wasn't necessary back then that's understandable. With warrants being the new age of who's regular or not now is when we have a big problem. Because it's relative new, the conversation of irregular and regular is really not valid.

The Grand Lodge system will be three hundred years old next year. Think about the expression "In America a hundred miles is considered a short distance and a hundred years is considered a long time." It stopped being a new system by the time the GL of Antients, the GL of Scotland, and the GL or Ireland were organizes.

Why? Because the origin of the UGLE didn't carry those type of documents and didn't care for them.

Historical detail. The United Grand Lodge of England was formed in 1812 when the Antients and Moderns merged. By then the Grand Lodge system was approaching a hundred years old.

You mean the 1717 foundation of the first Grand Lodge. Variously called the Moderns, the Premiere GL, the GL of Manchester and so on.

The Moderns were created out of thin air. The current set of rules about chartering a new jurisdiction can't be applied to them. They invented something new. The first Moderns were pioneers who created a system that did not exist before them.

And I'm PHA, I'm just interested in how it started on the other side of the fence.

The organization of the first Prince Hall GL had a different situation. The GL system already existed but they were rejected for reasons outside of Masonic principles. The first PH GL founders were pioneers of a different sort. They stuck to their principles in the context of an existing system that had rejected them.

This history gives context to clandestine jurisdictions that use the term Prince Hall. A specific lineage has been adopted back into the family. For any one brother there is the (ad)option of healing into that lineage. For any one lodge there is the (ad)option of rechartering into that lineage. For any one jurisdiction there is the (ad)option of uniting/consolidating/merging into that lineage.
 

JM-MWPHGLGA

Premium Member
FreeMasonry evolved from the guild system. The guild system evolved from previous historical systems. The chain of history and prehistory goes back to the point there were enough inventions in the field of architecture that a master/apprentice system was needed.



The Grand Lodge system will be three hundred years old next year. Think about the expression "In America a hundred miles is considered a short distance and a hundred years is considered a long time." It stopped being a new system by the time the GL of Antients, the GL of Scotland, and the GL or Ireland were organizes.



Historical detail. The United Grand Lodge of England was formed in 1812 when the Antients and Moderns merged. By then the Grand Lodge system was approaching a hundred years old.

You mean the 1717 foundation of the first Grand Lodge. Variously called the Moderns, the Premiere GL, the GL of Manchester and so on.

The Moderns were created out of thin air. The current set of rules about chartering a new jurisdiction can't be applied to them. They invented something new. The first Moderns were pioneers who created a system that did not exist before them.



The organization of the first Prince Hall GL had a different situation. The GL system already existed but they were rejected for reasons outside of Masonic principles. The first PH GL founders were pioneers of a different sort. They stuck to their principles in the context of an existing system that had rejected them.

This history gives context to clandestine jurisdictions that use the term Prince Hall. A specific lineage has been adopted back into the family. For any one brother there is the (ad)option of healing into that lineage. For any one lodge there is the (ad)option of rechartering into that lineage. For any one jurisdiction there is the (ad)option of uniting/consolidating/merging into that lineage.
I have to disagree with free masonry starting with the guild system. The craft dates back in ancient time. Warrants wasn't relevant in the two warring lodges which came about out of know where to now warrants are relevant. That sound very strange. Yes, I know it's up to each jurisdiction. I'm just stating if those warring lodges didn't care why UGLE cares about warrants now. So Mason's shouldn't be asking permission if it's ancient. Haha, to me it's crazy. But in any way am i going against the grain or going against what UGLE and PHA laws say. Laws are always changing in the political world so I see no wrong with Masonic law at all. I'm pretty sure I'm not the first who thought about it.


Sent from my iPhone using My Freemasonry Pro
 

coachn

Coach John S. Nagy
Premium Member
I have to disagree with free masonry starting with the guild system. The craft dates back in ancient time. ...
I have to agree with your disagreement. Free_Masonry has been around ever since mankind started whacking rocks masterfully.

However, Freemasonry has only been around since the Premier Grand Lodge merged the two words and started charging people to go through their morality plays to obtain titles and rights to participate in the same with others.
 

JM-MWPHGLGA

Premium Member
I have to agree with your disagreement. Free_Masonry has been around ever since mankind started whacking rocks masterfully.

However, Freemasonry has only been around since the Premier Grand Lodge merged the two words and started charging people to go through their morality plays to obtain titles and rights to participate in the same with others.
I can say I've only been in the craft or freemasonry just a couple of months. The vast knowledge thats available it's outstanding. This topic alone have taught me a lot.


Sent from my iPhone using My Freemasonry Pro
 

coachn

Coach John S. Nagy
Premium Member
I can say I've only been in the craft or freemasonry just a couple of months. The vast knowledge thats available it's outstanding. This topic alone have taught me a lot.


Sent from my iPhone using My Freemasonry Pro
A word of advice, the romantic notions are what get you into Freemasonry, but don't buy into the BS. It'll interfere with the Masonic Work to be done.
 

Glen Cook

G A Cook
Site Benefactor
Our "theater" was adopted during the mystery play era. It became privatized during the GL Era.[/QU
No doubt, thanks for that. There aren't many who can keep it straightforward. You surely bypass the shortcuts.


Sent from my iPhone using My Freemasonry Pro
i accept that the operatives had mysterie plays. Many guilds did. However, the were speculative Masons before the GL era. I think the privatization occurred before " GLE". That was the beginning of the monopoly era.
 

coachn

Coach John S. Nagy
Premium Member
i accept that the operatives had mysterie plays. Many guilds did. However, the were speculative Masons before the GL era. I think the privatization occurred before " GLE". That was the beginning of the monopoly era.
But that is the whole point Brother. "Speculative" masonry is an illusion. There's nothing that these non-operative masons were doing other than to pay for the rite and the rights. There was no "apprenticeship" served. These "speculative" members at best merely paid membership, obligated themselves with a rudimentary ceremony, maybe learned a few words and grips and they were members. These elaborate privatized morality plays began around the GL era.

If we define "Speculative" masonry to be a membership in an operative-speculative lodge that didn't require serving the usual operative-speculative apprenticeship, then we can say that it began with operative-speculative masonry since there were always those lodge willing to have paying patrons be members to support the business of the lodge... Occum's Razor Bro. Glen.

But if we were to define it based upon what is required today, it started with the franchising highly restrictive-regulated GL Era.
 

Glen Cook

G A Cook
Site Benefactor
....

If we define "Speculative" masonry to be a membership in an operative-speculative lodge that didn't require serving the usual operative-speculative apprenticeship, then we can say that it began with operative-speculative masonry since there were always those lodge willing to have paying patrons be members to support the business of the lodge...
a.
The issue would be when this began.
 

coachn

Coach John S. Nagy
Premium Member
The issue would be when this began.
And the answer is... <drum roll>

When lodges began selling membership that had nothing to do with operative work and everything to do with titles, rites and rights.

If you're looking for a date, the answer is obvious.... Since time immemorial :D
 

MRichard

Mark A. Ri'chard
Premium Member
So, the mind frame of irregular and regular concept has to be destroyed to say the least. (Even though that's not going to happen) I have only been a Master Mason for a couple of months if not that. I love the craft at a early age, but I see many downsides that breaks up a UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD. This is cause number one. It could be broken if we all meet on the level, and act upright.


Sent from my iPhone using My Freemasonry Pro

That is a slippery slope. PHA has been vigilant about clandestine lodges and regularity. This is actually one of their preferred arguments.
 
Top