My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Grand Master

BroBook

Premium Member
Ok so the consensus is yes? Unwritten law says, to sit in the E. You have served a full term as a W. To be a G.L.O. You have passed the chair, wait for it!!! But to be G.M. The only requirement is that you be a member of the C.
 

Glen Cook

G A Cook
Site Benefactor
Maybe this is the unwritten law in your jurisdiction, but not in my mother jurisdiction. I specifically know someone who served as a GLO who had not completed a term in the East
 

BroBook

Premium Member
That's really part of the original question, understanding, whatever, your grand lodge does is the rule, I was reading, Mackey's jurisprudence...page 6 landmark #4 note 13,maybe my understanding is under par!!!
 

Glen Cook

G A Cook
Site Benefactor
I would not accept Mackey as gospel. I would turn to your GL code and which ever landmarks, if any, your jurisdiction has adopted.
 

Glen Cook

G A Cook
Site Benefactor
I would not accept Mackey as gospel. I would turn to your GL code and which ever landmarks, if any, your jurisdiction has adopted.
 

Bill Lins

Moderating Staff
Staff Member
Every jurisdiction is different. Under GLoTX, one must be a PM to be a member of the GL, and one must be a member of the GL to become any GL officer, elected or appointed.
 

dfreybur

Premium Member
Ok so the consensus is yes? Unwritten law says, to sit in the E. You have served a full term as a W. To be a G.L.O. You have passed the chair, wait for it!!! But to be G.M. The only requirement is that you be a member of the C.

This happened in the colonial era with charters from the Premier Grand Lodge. Every so often you'll find a biography where a very eminent man i s appointed GM as a figurehead. I don't think that has happened anywhere in the US for a very long time.

Br Bill already reported that the Texas rules require any GL member to be a PM. I confirm that is the case in at least California and Illinois as well.

In California "voting member of GL" includes installed JW, SW and WM, "permanent member of GL" is all of the PMs. It's a variation in terminology not in meaning.
 

mrpierce17

KOP Council director / Lodge instructor
Premium Member
It is my understanding that you must first serve as a warden to sit as WM and you must first get elected and serve as GSW before you can become MWGM at least in our jurisdiction , if I am understanding the question correctly
 
Last edited:

KSigMason

Traveling Templar
Site Benefactor
In Idaho, you must obtain a Proficiency Certificate to sit as one of the Wardens. To be elected as Worshipful Master you must obtain a WM's Certificate of Proficiency and have served as one of the Wardens. To be an elected Grand Lodge officer you must be a PM. In Idaho though, we elect our DGM who then assumes the position as MWGM at the next Grand Lodge; only under certain circumstances would we elect both a DGM and MWGM at the same time.
 

Pscyclepath

Premium Member
Arkansas's requirements are similar. To be elected and serve as WM, you must first serve one year as one of the wardens. If for some reason it is necessary to install a brother who has not yet served as a warden, a dispensation must be granted by the Grans Lodge.

The Grand Line here is progressive, and the path to becoming Grand Master starts with your getting elected as Grand Junior Deacon. You then serve your way up the line as GSD, GJW, GSW, and DGM before finally putting on the hat as Grand Master six years later.
 

dfreybur

Premium Member
One year term limits ?

The traditional term as MWGM varies widely by jurisdiction. I don't recall a written rule in my jurisdictions just a long standing rarely broken tradition.

In California and Texas the GM serves one year, also in very many other jurisdictions. Illinois the GM serves two years unless unpopular enough to be voted out after the first year. That happened once in living memory. In England a member of the royal family serves for decades.

I don't understand the tradition in some PHA jurisdictions for a GM to serve many years. I don't have to understand. Your jurisdiction, your rules and traditions. Sort of like some jurisdictions only allowing a brother to be a member of exactly one jurisdiction with other jurisdictions it being common to be a member of many lodges.
 

Canadian Paul

Registered User
The 'Grand Master Mason' of the GL of Scotland is elected annually but usually serves for five years. Besides a deputy, called the Depute Grand Master, there is also a 'Substitute Grand Master'. As any daughter lodge may have any office found in Grand Lodge, my lodge has, sitting in the East, besides the Master and the Immediate Past Master, the Depute Master and the Substitute Master.
 
Top